Tag Archives: scott brown

Scott Brown Might Be Running For President. Or Senator. Or Governor.


Brown

 

By Ryan Isakow

9 months after relinquishing his Senatorial office to Elizabeth Warren, Scott Brown is making the rounds to Iowa, implying a possible presidential run. This is the latest of a series of hints from Brown about a return to political office; other possibilities include Governor of Massachusetts and Senator for New Hampshire (Brown has a second home in the granite state). The speculation over a return to office has brought national media attention back to Brown after a post-election fall of coverage.

Untitled-2

After almost entirely disappearing from the national media, Scott Brown is once again creating buzz for himself. This is no small feat – after losing a high profile election, it’s usually difficult for candidates to stay relevant. Scott Brown has also managed to stem the bleeding in his number of Facebook followers, accrued thanks in part to the large outside Tea Party support during his 2010 election.

Untitled-4

After gaining 70,000 followers in the run-up to the election, Brown lost 10,000 likes between the election and April. He’s almost closed the gap, and as speculation over a possible run increases he should be able to leverage publicity into a renewed social media presence.

Scott Brown’s biggest challenge since he lost the 2012 election is figuring out where he can reenter politics. A return to the Senate from Massachusetts seems unlikely; the next election would be 2014 against Ed Markey, who has been in Congress for decades and has a strong base of support. In addition, it is hard to imagine Brown getting the same out of state grassroots support he got in 2010, during the height of the health care debate.

New Hampshire provides a safer ground, but bringing a political career between states is difficult at best – James Shields is the last person to serve in multiple Senate delegations, representing Illinois in 1849, Minnesota in 1858, and Missouri in 1879. Waitman Thomas Willey also served as Senator for both Virginia in 1861 and West Virginia in 1863.  Unfortunately for Brown, the lack of civil wars and the direct election of Senators make a similar feat unlikely.

This leaves him with Governor or President. Massachusetts Governor Deval Patrick is not running for reelection, offering an open seat for Brown to try and renew his political career. Running for President offers a competitive Republican primary with the added bonus of running as a recently defeated Senator with less than two years spent actually in office – half as much as Barack Obama when he was elected president. If I were Scott Brown, I know what I would pick.

We’ll be keeping an eye on Scott Brown’s attempt to reenter public service. Wherever that may be.

Senate races as close as 0.5% based on news and social buzz…


As you know these Senate races are highly publicized and close in the polls:

Elizabeth Warren v. Scott Brown (MA) +4.7 RCP / +4.9 538 Blog

Chris Murphy v. Linda McMahon (CT) +3.1 RCP / +4.6 538 Blog

Jeff Flake v. Richard Carmona (AZ) +0.6 RCP / +2.9 538 Blog

Richard Mourdock v. Joe Donnelly (IN) +5 RCP / +1.8 538 Blog

Sherrod Brown v. Josh Mandel (OH) +5.2 RCP / +6.4 538 Blog

Here’s what TrendPo Rank has them today:

Elizabeth Warren v. Scott Brown (MA)  TR-5 to TR-14 | 0.5% difference

Linda McMahon v. Chris Murphy (CT)    TR-216 to TR-225 | 0.5% difference

Jeff Flake v. Richard Carmona (AZ)       TR-173 to TR-177 | 0.2% difference

Richard Mourdock v. Joe Donnelly (IN)  TR-21 to TR-152 | 8% difference *

Sherrod Brown v. Josh Mandel (OH)      TR-164 to TR-175 | 0.6% difference

The TrendPo Rank calculates every politician relative to all 1600 ballot candidates for Nov. 6th (Governors, Senators, House incumbents and challengers).

So the fact that two candidates are as little as eleven or even three (ex: Flake v. Carmona) TrendPo Ranks apart shows how closely their news and social is tied together. But we definitely didn’t expect these Senate races to be as close as 0.3% out of 1600 national politicians.

We’ll continue to analyze this data and show our findings here in the blog.

 

(previously we showed this as 0.8%, but the race in Indiana is TR-21 to TR-152, an 8% difference between Mourdock and Donnelly)

About TrendPo Rank: Each day TrendPo scrapes various sorts of social media, national media, beltway media, and state media to track buzz among national politicians. We run sentiment analysis on the tone of every news article — eg. sentiment analysis against content, not message; and we track gains and losses on every politician’s social pages. From all this Big Data, we calculate a daily rank of trending “buzz”. We call this the TrendPo Rank.

TrendPo Rank is an indicator of news and social buzz. Time will tell if this type of buzz actually correlates to election results but in the meantime, we think it’s an interesting data point in understanding the political message cycle:

Politicians PUSH message to news outlets who INTERPRET the message to mass audiences who VET the message using social media as their voice.